Pengaruh Uang Muka Dan Termin Pada Target Keuntungan Pihak Penyedia Jasa Proyek Konstruksi

Main Article Content

Rachmi Yanita
Fauzan Wanuri

Abstract

The method of payment for construction project costs is regulated in the construction contract, namely without and with down payments and or terms. Down payment can be given, regulated in presidential, government and LKPP regulations regarding the procurement of goods and services where the aim is to assist service providers or contractors in the preparation stage for construction work. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of the presence of down payment and terms of a study project contract without down payment on the targeted profit. The research method is carried out by analyzing the cash flow of the project with a variation of 0% down payment, and 10% without and with a term of 15%,25% and 50%  of the project value. Cash flow describes the flow of receipts and expenditures of project costs whose balances cannot be negative for the continuity of the project. Data obtained through intensive interviews with contractors includes direct and indirect project costs, project schedules and S-curves, timing of disbursement of invoices, and targeted profits. From the results of the analysis it was found that without a down payment, the amount of profit or final cash balance was 13.05% or below the targeted 15%, while with an advance the profit was 15.71% and 17.56% plus the term after achievement above 25%. Down payments and terms have a positive effect on contractor profits in line with declining loans and interest on loans. 


Keywords: cash flow, down payment, term, profit


 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Yanita, R., & Wanuri, F. (2024). Pengaruh Uang Muka Dan Termin Pada Target Keuntungan Pihak Penyedia Jasa Proyek Konstruksi. KILAT, 13(1), 20–28. Retrieved from https://jurnalitpln.id/kilat/article/view/2193
Section
Articles
Author Biography

Fauzan Wanuri, Institut Teknologi Indonesia

Prodi Teknik Sipil, Intitut Teknologi Indonesia

References

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Wiranata, A. A., Adnyana, I. B. R., &Putiyana, I. P. (2018). Analisis Variasi Sistem Pembayaran ProgressPayment Terhadap Keuntungan Kontraktor Pada Proyek Pembangunan Pura Jagat Tirta Bandara I Gst Ngurah Rai Badung–Bali. Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Sipil, 22(2).

Soeharto I, (1995), Manajemen proyek dari konseptual sampai operasional, Penerbit Erlangga, Jakarta .

Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan RI (2021). Peraturan Pemerintah No.7 Tahun 2021 Tentang Kemudahan, Pelindungan, Dan Pemberdayaan Koperasi dan Usaha Mikro, Kecil dan Menengah

Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan RI (2021). Peraturan Presiden Nomor 16 Tahun 2018 Tentang Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah Yang Telah Diubah Dengan Peraturan Presiden Nomor 12 Tahun 2021

Siregar, B. A. D., & Ardiansyah, A. (2022). Analisis Pengaruh Sistem Pembayaran Terhadap Keuntungan Proyek. Rustic: Jurnal Arsitektur, 2(1), 41-56. E-Issn: 2775-7528. Jakarta.

Remi, F. F. (2017). Kajian faktor penyebab costoverrun pada proyek konstruksi gedung. Jurnal Teknik Mesin Mercu Buana, 6(2), 94-101.

Emmanuel D. O dkk. (2021). AttributesAndImpactOf Advance Payment System On CashFlow, Project AndOrganisational Performance. DOI 10.1108/JFMPC-03-2021-0022. ISSN: 1366-4387. Cape Town. SouthAfrica.

Wirahman, L., Warka, I. G. P., & Apriliana, A. (2015). Pengaruh Sistem Pembayaran Terhadap Cash Flow Optimal Pada Proyek Pembangunan Gedung Pengadilan Negeri Praya: The Influence Of Payment System Addition On The Optimum CashFlowOfConstruction Project Of Praya Country Courthouse. Spektrum Sipil, 2(2), 145-157.

Asiyanto.2005.Construction Project Cost Management. PT. Pradnya Paramita. Jakarta.

Halpin, D. W., Woodhead, R. W. (1998). Construction Management. John Wiley & Sons, Canada.